Títulos en Legislación

At a time when the hottest issue in US immigration law is the proposed action by President Obama to protect from deportation as many as five million illegals in the United States, the John Lennon case takes on special relevance, notwithstanding the passage of 40 years since he was placed in deportation proceedings. This is John and Yoko's incredible story, as told by the lawyer who fought in the front lines.

For the last four decades, John Henry Browne has defended the indefensible. From Facebook folk hero the "Barefoot Bandit" Colton Moore, to Benjamin Ng of the Wah Mee massacre and Kandahar massacre culprit Sergeant Robert Bales, Browne's unceasing advocacy and the daring to take on some of the most unwinnable cases - and nearly win them all - has led 48 Hours' Peter Van Sant to call him "the most famous lawyer in America."

In this dramatic and fully accessible account of these titans of the early republic and their fiercely held ideas, James F. Simon brings to life the early history of the nation and sheds new light on the highly charged battle to balance the powers of the federal government and the rights of the states. A fascinating look at two of the nation's greatest statesmen and shrewdest politicians, What Kind of Nation presents a cogent, unbiased assessment of their lasting impact on American government.

Interesante recopilación de textos del literato y jurista Jesús Feijóo Domínguez, desde cartas al director hasta reflexiones al vuelo hechas durante sus primeros viajes o textos experimentales que pergeñaba mientras realizaba su labor como jurista.

In 2012, Hakeem al-Araibi was a promising young player on Bahrain's national football team when he was arrested for attacking a police station during the Arab Spring, despite television footage showing him playing soccer at the time of the alleged attack. After three months of torture and wrongful imprisonment, Hakeem was released. He fled the country and made his way to Australia, where he was granted refugee status. Hakeem made a life here and was playing for the suburban Pascoe Vale Football Club, in Melbourne. He thought he was safe.

En los últimos 15 años, México ha librado algunas de sus batallas más importantes... en la Suprema Cortede Justicia de la Nación. Ahí se han debatido—y definido—los límites a la libertad de expresión, los derechos de los indígenas a juicios justos, las fronteras de la privacidad, la inclusión, el valor de los tratados internacionales e incluso el "derecho a la irreverencia". Y gracias a jueces como José Ramón Cossío, las perspectivas más progresistas han ido ganando terreno. En esta obra, el exministro explica algunos de los votos más importantes de su carrera.

Detrás de los macanazos y las balas, hubo un sistema judicial que convalidó la represión y actuó convencido de su bondad. Nació el 26 de julio de 1968 y murió dos años después. Pero en su corta vida, multiplicó la iniquidad y la injusticia, provocó el encarcelamiento de decenas de jóvenes y evidenció la saña del Estado. Ésta es la historia -nunca antes contada- del proceso judicial contra los implicados en el 68 mexicano.

Reflexión erudita, testimonio urgente y alegato políticamente poderoso de Sebreli que, al cumplir noventa años, en plena pandemia del Covid-19, habiéndose contagiado y recuperado, rescata el concepto clásico de desobediencia civil y lo propone como modo de resistencia responsable a los atropellos a la libertad y de defensa de la democracia.

On May 3, 1946, in St. Martinsville, Louisiana, a 17-year-old Black boy was scheduled for execution by electric chair. Willie Francis had been charged with murder; his trial had been brief; his death sentence never in doubt. When the executioners flipped the switch, Willie screamed and writhed as electricity coursed through his body. But Willie Francis did not die. Having miraculously survived, Willie was informed that the state would attempt to execute him a second time within a week.

Erhalte mit "Im Namen des Volkes" einen Blick hinter die Kulissen der Justiz: Kann ein Richter seine persönlichen Überzeugungen aus einem Verfahren heraushalten? Wie bringt man in Erfahrung, was wirklich passiert ist? Und kann es überhaupt gerechte Urteile geben? Diese Fragen besprechen Jonas Reese und Benjamin Roellenbleck, Vorsitzender Richter am Landgericht Köln, in diesem Podcast - nun schon in der zweiten Staffel. In jeder Folge geht es um ein bekanntes Urteil, das für Aufsehen, Empörung oder Erleichterung gesorgt hat und nicht nur juristische Fragen aufwirft, sondern auch ethische und politische.

Muss ich mein Kind in die Schule schicken? Kriege ich für den abgebrochenen Fingernagel Schmerzensgeld? Kann ich hiermit vor Gericht ziehen oder damit vor Gericht gezogen werden? Das Fachwissen von Anwälten wird im Freundeskreis gern angezapft. Denn: Für normale Menschen ist die Welt der Juristerei ziemlich mysteriös. Auch in Staffel 2 des Original Podcasts "Sag mal, du als Richterin" geben ein Anwalt und eine Richterin freimütig die Reiseführer für einen Neuling durch das unwegsame Reich der Paragraphen.

What explains the insistent pull of Roe v. Wade? Abortion law expert Mary Ziegler argues that the US Supreme Court decision, which decriminalized abortion in 1973 and was overturned in 2022, had a hold on us that was not simply the result of polarized abortion politics. Rather, Roe took on meanings far beyond its original purpose of protecting the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship. It forced us to confront questions about sexual violence, judicial activism and restraint, racial justice, religious liberty, the role of science in politics, and much more.

This audiobook features opening arguments followed by two rounds of reply between two moral philosophers on opposing sides of the abortion debate. In the opening essays, Kate Greasley and Christopher Kaczor lay out what they take to be the best case for and against abortion rights. In the ensuing dialogue, they engage with each other’s arguments, and each responds to criticisms fielded by the other. The result gives listeners a window into how moral philosophers argue about the contentious issue of abortion rights, and an in-depth analysis of the compelling arguments on both sides.

Sag mal, muss ich das wirklich zahlen? Darf mein Vermieter das? Kannst Du die Akte mal ganz kurz überfliegen? Das Fachwissen von Anwältinnen und Anwälten wird im Freundeskreis gern angezapft. Denn: Für normale Menschen ist die Welt der Juristerei einfach total mysteriös.

"Im Namen des Volkes" ermöglicht einen Blick hinter die Kulissen der Justiz: Wie bilden sich Richter ein Urteil, wenn sie Angeklagte ins Gefängnis schicken? Hadern sie manchmal mit ihren Entscheidungen? Und was ist überhaupt Gerechtigkeit? Diese Fragen bespricht Jonas Reese mit Benjamin Roellenbleck, Vorsitzender Richter am Landgericht Köln. In jeder Folge geht es um ein bekanntes Urteil oder einen Prozess, die unser Rechtssystem besonders geprägt haben.

Deliberate mischaracterization of political opponents and their policies has always been a part of politics; however, lying, dishonesty, and distortion of the facts remain morally wrong and have the potential to obstruct important political interests. For example, a false or misleading claim publicized about an election candidate may lead someone to lose an election that they might otherwise have won. So, does—and should—the law seek to provide protection from the risk of this happening?

Forever Prisoners offers the first broad history of immigrant detention in the United States. Elliott Young focuses on five stories, including Chinese detained off the coast of Washington in the late 1880s, an "insane" Russian-Brazilian Jew caught on a ship shuttling between New York and South America during World War I, Japanese Peruvians kidnapped and locked up in a Texas jail during World War II, a prison uprising by Mariel Cuban refugees in 1987, and a Salvadoran mother who grew up in the United States and has spent years incarcerated while fighting deportation.

The case for assisted suicide can seem so compelling. Surely it can't be wrong to help desperate people to kill themselves? Don't we have a right to take our own lives in certain circumstances? There are no trite or easy answers. John Wyatt helps us to navigate the arguments with hearts and heads engaged, and above all with our Bibles open. There are practical and compassionate alternatives to assisted suicide, and as many who have gone before us have found, the end of our lives on this earth may turn out to be a strange and wonderful opportunity for growth and internal healing.

Quanti sono gli errori giudiziari in Italia? Quante persone ogni anno subiscono la custodia cautelare, salvo poi rivelarsi innocenti? E qual è la spesa che lo Stato affronta per risarcirle? Quante di loro ottengono un indennizzo? Le ingiuste detenzioni macchiano come una brutta malattia la quotidianità della giustizia, gli errori sono la vergogna della vergogna e assumono proporzioni inimmaginabili. Dal 1991 al 31 dicembre 2020 i casi sono stati 29.659: in media, poco più di 988 l'anno.

La magistratura può risalire la china soltanto e soprattutto con la cultura, prima ancora che con le leggi; ritornando a ragionare di una cultura della legalità sostanziale, della reputazione, della responsabilità. In questo lungo periodo di "detenzione forzata", a causa dell'epidemia da coronavirus, molto di quel che davamo per scontato si è dimostrato, alla prova dei fatti, quanto mai fragile e pericolante. La giustizia, con tutto il suo portato di esperienze, non ha fatto eccezione.